3 ms·
The combined requirements of govt purchasing must carry the mark and major US surveillance tech manufacturers like Amazon are leading the rollout, makes this se
by jzebedee 2y ago
The combined requirements of govt purchasing must carry the mark and major US surveillance tech manufacturers like Amazon are leading the rollout, makes this seem less like a cybersecurity concern and more of a protectionist carve out.
- deadbabe 2y ago[flagged]
- Jtsummers 2y agoThis has been in the works for a while now. This is not a last minute thing.
- deadbabe 2y ago[flagged]
- Jtsummers 2y agoAt least as early as August 2023. Less than three quarters of the way through his presidency. Something that started at least 17 months ago can hardly be considered "last minute". EDIT: Found the answer for you since you can't be bothered (previously saw the date in some other doc reading about this): https://www.fcc.gov/CyberTrustMark https://www.fcc.gov/CyberTrustMark > When was the U.S. Cyber Trust Mark program created? >> In August 2023, the FCC sought public comment on how to create the Cyber Trust Mark program. In March 2024, based on public input, we adopted rules establishing the framework for the program.
- contextfree 2y agoThis is from July 2023: https://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2023/07/white-house-announces-new-program-designate-cyber-secure-iot-devices/388589/ https://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2023/07/white-house-an...
- kube-system 2y ago2021: https://www.nist.gov/itl/applied-cybersecurity/nist-cybersecurity-iot-program/consumer-iot-cybersecurity https://www.nist.gov/itl/applied-cybersecurity/nist-cybersec...
- readyplayernull 2y agoLaser safety glasses in Amazon are so fake anyone could come up with a conspiracy theory about some country trying to blind the population of another.
- knowitnone 2y agocool. you get to sue Amazon for millions for the loss of one eye
- SketchySeaBeast 2y agoYou mean get stuck in a legal battle which takes years where Amazon denies responsibility and pushes everything to the original vendor, who for some reason went out of business 15 minutes before the suit was filed?