4 ms·
> and television (Which enabled entertainment as a passive indirect consumption) Absolutely. There were periods of time in history when there was significant o
by mindcrime 2y ago
> and television (Which enabled entertainment as a passive indirect consumption)
Absolutely. There were periods of time in history when there was significant opposition to television. Hence the coining of terms like "boob tube", "idiot box", "idiot's lantern", "cultural wasteland", etc. You can see a bit more of some of that (although not with a primarily historical focus) here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_aspects_of_television#Negative_effects_of_television https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_aspects_of_television#N...
EDIT:
For yet more on this topic:
https://behavioralscientist.org/history-panic-entertainment-technology/ https://behavioralscientist.org/history-panic-entertainment-...
https://20thcenturyhistorysongbook.com/song-book/the-fifties/criticism-of-1950s-television/ https://20thcenturyhistorysongbook.com/song-book/the-fifties...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Arguments_for_the_Elimination_of_Television https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Arguments_for_the_Elimina...
- troutwine 2y agoAlso: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amusing_Ourselves_to_Death https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amusing_Ourselves_to_Death
- zetalyrae 2y agoAnd they were right. Television created nothing of value.
- ethbr1 2y agoIt broke movie studios as gatekeepers for mass distribution.
- tivert 2y ago> And they were right. Television created nothing of value. Exactly. Bad things can and do become normalized and then unremarked upon. Some people confuse that phenomenon with those things actually being good. People often have clearer eyes at the transition.