4 ms·
It could be true that the immigration law is so opaque and changes so quickly that both our statements could be true depending on the year / circumstances... W
by 3vidence 2y ago
It could be true that the immigration law is so opaque and changes so quickly that both our statements could be true depending on the year / circumstances...
With that being said for source you can review this site and many others that will say the same thing about intention to permanently reside with a TN visa
https://manifestlaw.com/blog/tn-visa-to-green-card https://manifestlaw.com/blog/tn-visa-to-green-card
Lastly your statement of incorrectness also sites no sources so I guess we just both have our opinions at this point
- notevenremotely 2y ago> https://manifestlaw.com/blog/tn-visa-to-green-card https://manifestlaw.com/blog/tn-visa-to-green-card Nothing in that article contradicts anything I have said. Not a great article either. Very boiler-plate and doesn't mention the 90 day rule for either TN to EB GC or marriage based GC. > Lastly your statement of incorrectness also sites no sources so I guess we just both have our opinions at this point Those figures are not public but it's a reasonable statement considering NAFTA has been in place since 1994, over fifty thousand Canadians have been awarded green cards over the last five years[0] and I am one of those people. [0] - Page 2 - https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Diversity-Visa/DV-Instructions-Translations/DV-2026-Instructions-Translations/DV%202026%20Plain%20Language%20Instructions%20and%20FAQs.pdf https://travel.state.gov/content/dam/visas/Diversity-Visa/DV...