4 ms·

I found the idea of entanglement rather than telemetry compelling. Maybe we can get “mixed up” and hear in our mind as a subflow. Some populations may be more

I found the idea of entanglement rather than telemetry compelling. Maybe we can get “mixed up” and hear in our mind as a subflow. Some populations may be more sensitive or less conditioned to filter for normality (normalcy?) I didn’t find the authors “incredulity” very scientific, though the presentation in the tapes is quite shabby. I could have laughed milk out my nose when they used math. Who knows what else they goofed up right?

PaulHoule 2y ago
I was looking for some supplies at the occult shop at the mall last weekend and was telling them that, from my point of view as a cond-mat PhD,is that the greatest miracle of quantum entanglement is that thanks to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi%E2%80%93Dirac_statistics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi%E2%80%93Dirac_statistics solid matter is possible, and secondarily https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_statistics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_statisti... makes the laser possible. All that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93Podolsky%E2%80%93Rosen_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93Podolsky%E2%8... people are fascinated with is a distant third if that. I have to admit that I've had some of the weirdest coincidences such as my mother dying the day after I got married in secret and that whenever I cast the I Ching in grad school I always got https://divination.com/iching/lookup/23-2/ https://divination.com/iching/lookup/23-2/ which was interpreted quite a bit more negatively in the two translations I had, particularly in that the current goal was impossible and it was necessary for the situation to blow over before you could progress. (e.g. newer translations try to be a lot more upbeat than the old ones)
- overu589 2y ago
  Well I think what was interpreted wrongly was that information could not propagate faster than light. The argument is that before time-space the Universe is a hyper dimensional. Vibration and periodicity giving way to the kind of probabilistic divergence described by D.D. In The Fabric of Reality. The entire universe might well spring from this vibrational axis giving rise to all. Space time would emerge from the entropic dilation. If entanglement was the synchronization of vibrational coordinates, that “vector” could have one resolved state. I would not rule out instantaneous communication by that principle alone.
  - krapp 2y ago
    Even with quantum entanglement, information cannot propagate faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. This has already been experimentally verified, and the light-speed limit itself is one of the most thoroughly well proven concepts in physics. Here are two sources but you can find plenty of others [0,1]. [0]https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-explained/entanglement https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-e... [1]https://www.forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/the-real-reasons-quantum-entanglement-doesnt-allow-faster-than-light-communication/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/the-real-r...
    - PaulHoule 2y ago
      Personally I think it's deeper than that. In God's geometry I think there is no way to say "faster than light". During the pandemic Steve Wolfram went off on a vainglorious scheme to unify physics (kinda doomed) but I appreciated his approach to "superspace" (the configurations of space/time that one might want to write a wavefunction over) in that causal networks must exist: e.g. two points have a spacelike relation or one is in the future of the other)

PaulHoule 2y ago

I was looking for some supplies at the occult shop at the mall last weekend and was telling them that, from my point of view as a cond-mat PhD,is that the greatest miracle of quantum entanglement is that thanks to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi%E2%80%93Dirac_statistics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi%E2%80%93Dirac_statistics solid matter is possible, and secondarily https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_statistics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_statisti... makes the laser possible. All that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93Podolsky%E2%80%93Rosen_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93Podolsky%E2%8... people are fascinated with is a distant third if that. I have to admit that I've had some of the weirdest coincidences such as my mother dying the day after I got married in secret and that whenever I cast the I Ching in grad school I always got https://divination.com/iching/lookup/23-2/ https://divination.com/iching/lookup/23-2/ which was interpreted quite a bit more negatively in the two translations I had, particularly in that the current goal was impossible and it was necessary for the situation to blow over before you could progress. (e.g. newer translations try to be a lot more upbeat than the old ones)

overu589 2y ago
Well I think what was interpreted wrongly was that information could not propagate faster than light. The argument is that before time-space the Universe is a hyper dimensional. Vibration and periodicity giving way to the kind of probabilistic divergence described by D.D. In The Fabric of Reality. The entire universe might well spring from this vibrational axis giving rise to all. Space time would emerge from the entropic dilation. If entanglement was the synchronization of vibrational coordinates, that “vector” could have one resolved state. I would not rule out instantaneous communication by that principle alone.
- krapp 2y ago
  Even with quantum entanglement, information cannot propagate faster than the speed of light in a vacuum. This has already been experimentally verified, and the light-speed limit itself is one of the most thoroughly well proven concepts in physics. Here are two sources but you can find plenty of others [0,1]. [0]https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-explained/entanglement https://scienceexchange.caltech.edu/topics/quantum-science-e... [1]https://www.forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/the-real-reasons-quantum-entanglement-doesnt-allow-faster-than-light-communication/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/chadorzel/2016/05/04/the-real-r...
  - PaulHoule 2y ago
    Personally I think it's deeper than that. In God's geometry I think there is no way to say "faster than light". During the pandemic Steve Wolfram went off on a vainglorious scheme to unify physics (kinda doomed) but I appreciated his approach to "superspace" (the configurations of space/time that one might want to write a wavefunction over) in that causal networks must exist: e.g. two points have a spacelike relation or one is in the future of the other)