3 ms·
The more direct reason that Zuck gave previously was because they couldn't rely on the political neutrality of the fact checkers. There's a fine line between op
by Neil44 2y ago
The more direct reason that Zuck gave previously was because they couldn't rely on the political neutrality of the fact checkers. There's a fine line between opinion and fact I guess.
- Y-bar 2y agoAnd community note participation will be guaranteed to be politically neutral, right, Zuck? And I want to re-iterate that not everything should be politically neutral: Stance A: "A certain group of people should be gassed with Zyklon-B." Stance B: "No group of people should ever be gassed, you not should be saying that!" Political neutral stance: "Maybe we could agree that some subset of that group could be gassed? I can't take a firm stance on this sensitive political matter."