3 ms·
Simon don’t waste your time with this guy. I thought he was affiliated with htmx but he’s just some jerk off trying to prove he’s “right”.
by nindalf 2y ago
Simon don’t waste your time with this guy. I thought he was affiliated with htmx but he’s just some jerk off trying to prove he’s “right”.
- yawaramin 2y agoI encourage you to read the guidelines and familiarize yourself with what is acceptable in HN comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- nindalf 2y agoYou're right, thanks for the reminder. Simon don’t waste your time with this guy. I thought he was affiliated with htmx but he’s just some dude trying to prove he’s “right”.
- yawaramin 2y agoBeing affiliated with htmx or not doesn't change basic facts about web accessibility :-D Go look at the links I posted, look for the issues people filed against the repos claiming that their dynamic content updates break screen readers. There are zero. People understand how web accessibility works and what responsibilities lie at which parts of their stack. Now if you say that component frameworks like shadcn/ui or whatnot should implement accessible behaviours and patterns, I am 100% with you on that. But React/Vue/htmx are at a lower level, they can't decide those things for you. EDIT: sure enough, someone filed an issue with shadcn/ui that it does not announce something properly in screenreaders: https://github.com/shadcn-ui/ui/issues/4209 https://github.com/shadcn-ui/ui/issues/4209