3 ms·
Consistency is never the sole reason to change something, there's always consistency and at least one of the following: - coherency - type safety (shout-out t
by whilenot-dev 2y ago
Consistency is never the sole reason to change something, there's always consistency and at least one of the following:
- coherency
- type safety (shout-out to dynamically typed languages that adapted static typing)
- concurrency
- simplicity
- (and more)
> If it's actually better, others will start following your lead.
A lot of people don't want to improve the quality in their output and for various reasons... some are happy to have something "to pay the bills", some don't want to use a programming language to its full extend, some have a deeply rooted paradigm that worked for 10 years already ("static types won't change that"), others are scared of concurrency etc. For some people there's nothing to worry about when a server can be blocked by a single request for 60 secs.