3 ms·
This is done before the SFP+ module sees the signal, but the module makes the design assumption that it is being done. It is right for 10G ethernet, it is wron
by jrockway 2y ago
This is done before the SFP+ module sees the signal, but the module makes the design assumption that it is being done. It is right for 10G ethernet, it is wrong (at a certain time scale) for SPDIF.
I also think that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_code https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_code is the term you're looking for.
- nomel 2y agoAhh, I'm only familiar with the copper side of things. But, that explains why the search came up with nothing for SFP+! > I also think that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_code https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_code is the term you're looking for. In 10G ethernet phy's, it's a multiplicative (self-synchronizing) scramblers [1] and does not use line code. From what I remember, it's statistically fine, and plays into LDPC correction easier. [1] https://www.iol.unh.edu/sites/default/files/knowledgebase/10gec/10GbE_Cl49.pdf https://www.iol.unh.edu/sites/default/files/knowledgebase/10...