I think that reduction works for tic tacs but perhaps not for fetuses/embryos/fertilized eggs. I can say that I agree with the statement, "embryos are not sent

I think that reduction works for tic tacs but perhaps not for fetuses/embryos/fertilized eggs. I can say that I agree with the statement, "embryos are not sentient", but I cannot speak to whether the "fascist" believes that the sentience of the embryo is the important part. Even if it were, our concept of sentience will probably be self-serving, based on our stake in the discussion. The 13-week compromise was unsatisfying for many people. A 20-week compromise would satisfy some people more and others less. At some point the fetus must acquire sentience, if you believe it didn't have it at one point and you believe that a baby does, so the discussion may be a matter of what point you define it. To say that it is imbued with sentience at birth is merely to choose a convenient point that is unlikely to be true in fact. In which case, to not set a limit on abortion means that you do not really care about sentient beings at all, if you were saying that sentience was the important thing to you. Oops, now it will become a discussion of the rights of one being over the rights of another, and we are all fascists now.