I feel like the ocaml solution would fit zigs usecase well. In ocaml you can redefine operators... but only in the context of another module. So if I re-defin

I feel like the ocaml solution would fit zigs usecase well. In ocaml you can redefine operators... but only in the context of another module. So if I re-define + in some module Vec3, I can do: Vec3.(a + b + c + d) Or even: let open Vec3 in a + b + c + d So there you go, no "where did the + operator come from?" questions when reading the source, and still much nicer than: a.add(b).add(c).add(d) I doubt zig will change though. The language is starting to crystallize and anything that solved this challenge would be massive.