3 ms·
not sure if this is for infotainment, or the real time control of the car? or just for the autonomous computing? it's pretty vague to me. or is it the redhat v
by synergy20 2y ago
not sure if this is for infotainment, or the real time control of the car? or just for the autonomous computing? it's pretty vague to me.
or is it the redhat version of AGL https://www.automotivelinux.org/ https://www.automotivelinux.org/ which is more for the infotainment.
- sillywalk 2y agoIt says "mixed-criticality" "Mixed-criticality essentially means one chip is running two pieces of software that require disparate safety levels. An example would be a single chip that controls both radio volume and electric steering controls. A failure of audio controls is annoying — while a failure of steering controls is dangerous, possibly even life-threatening."[0] It says they're working on ISO 26262 Automotive Safety Integrity Level B (ASIL-B) which from[0] says - "medium-risk" for failures e.g. headlights or rear-camera. [0] https://blogs.blackberry.com/en/2022/09/why-mixed-criticality-is-the-future-of-automotive-architectures https://blogs.blackberry.com/en/2022/09/why-mixed-criticalit...
- HeyLaughingBoy 2y agoDo you know if this is common in automotive? In medical devices that follow IEC62304 we usually try to physically segregate code that are at different safety classifications. [edit] after RTFM'ing I see why they do it.