> she greatly overestimates how free the press is (or was) just because she'd never had a point of view censored I don't know if she had any illusions about it

> she greatly overestimates how free the press is (or was) just because she'd never had a point of view censored I don't know if she had any illusions about it being completely free before, but the point is that it's clearly heading in the direction of "less free" as a direct consequence of corporate interests owning media and concerns about financial blowbacks from a vindictive president not against the news org itself but other companies held by the news org's owners. That is a huge problem.