4 ms·
Then the audio drops out, so it's a self-correcting problem! Also, the beam is a bit divergent, even if it vibrates the beam could still cover the sensor.
by ragebol 2y ago
Then the audio drops out, so it's a self-correcting problem!
Also, the beam is a bit divergent, even if it vibrates the beam could still cover the sensor.
- dylan604 2y agoNot necessarily. The sub is not usually attached to a wall, so it wouldn't self correct like you're suggesting
- chowells 2y agoI think you missed a joke there. Loss of signal -> silence -> no vibrations -> signal resumption.
- dylan604 2y agono, you're missing the point. the subwoofer is not connect to a wall that vibrates, so it wouldn't miss the signal. the surround speakers and possibly the front and surround speakers tend to be attached to a wall. The floor doesn't shake enough for the sub to loose alignment is the point.
- ragebol 2y agoI was making a joke though. Also, if you bounce the signal off a mirror on the wall like DIY Perks did, then walls vibrating even a little bit will be an issue if the beam is narrow enough.
- simoncion 2y agoWell, (to treat this seriously, rather than the joke it was) where's your transmitter? And are there vibration-sensitive components inside of either the transmitter or receiver? Several times a month, cars idle outside my apartment with bass loud enough to severely shake my windows, and somewhat shake my walls and floor. I imagine a receiver that's physically attached (or merely very near) to a subwoofer that loud would have trouble maintaining a steady optical link.
- kridsdale3 2y agoWhat an excellent natural interpretation of "DROP THE BASS"