> LLMs are performing on a level that is beyond human jr. devs, and quickly catching up with the next tier. I am a little more pessimistic. I would say that LL

> LLMs are performing on a level that is beyond human jr. devs, and quickly catching up with the next tier. I am a little more pessimistic. I would say that LLMs have been hovering above junior for a year or two, with some progress towards intermediate in the context of a few methods/classes, but not much evidence of the wider architectural/systems-level thinking that I'd expect from an intermediate.