5 ms·
How much would HTMX internals change if these proposals were accepted? Is this a big simplification or a small amount of what HTMX covers? Similarly, any inter
by theptip 2y ago
How much would HTMX internals change if these proposals were accepted? Is this a big simplification or a small amount of what HTMX covers?
Similarly, any interesting ways you could see other libraries adopting these new options?
- recursivedoubts 2y agoi don't think it would change htmx at all, we'd probably keep the attribute namespaces separate just to avoid accidentally stomping on behavior i do think it would reduce and/or eliminate the need for htmx in many cases, which is a good thing: the big idea w/htmx is to push the idea of hypermedia and hypermedia controls further, and if those ideas make it into the web platform so much the better
- paulddraper 2y agoThis covers a lot of the common stuff. This is native HTMX, or at least a good chuck of the basics.