3 ms·
I completely agree. What's worse is that the article doesn't even really present the opposite view, instead just agreeing with the general point of the original
by dyeje 14y ago
I completely agree. What's worse is that the article doesn't even really present the opposite view, instead just agreeing with the general point of the original and stating it's attention instead of time, essentially arguing semantics. This is pretty aggravating.
- alttab 14y agoI disagree, it's not semantics. It's nuance. Which is important. I think he is saying its about focus. I often take the financially non optimum choice because I know what truly needs my attention. It's essentially opportunity cost. Is it worth a blog post? No answer to this question is meaningful as I'm sure is a matter of preference. Also, so what? Unless its your favorite blog author and you thought he wasted time with this one as a content consumer you don't lose anything.