> Agreed he could have searched for the spelling Or just not qualify it. People make typos, nothing wrong with that. But the qualification means they felt they

> Agreed he could have searched for the spelling Or just not qualify it. People make typos, nothing wrong with that. But the qualification means they felt they don’t know the spelling but couldn’t be bothered to do the 1 second thing and look it up. It is one of those cases where being confidently wrong is less insulting than being wrong, suspecting that you are wrong but not caring about it. > You wouldn't say "however he is spelled". No. As discussed above I would search for it. But if one has to express this already bad thing one can write “however he spells his name”. I guess the reason i’m sensitive to this is that I’m bored of seeing people performatively mispronounce names. Not saying that is what happened here. In fact it is probably not what happened. Just that it reminded me of that particular kind of uglyness.