4 ms·
Uh... I don't really see how this approach can work, since it seems like it's begging a fundamental question: Why should we believe that any of the characters w
by Terr_ 2y ago
Uh... I don't really see how this approach can work, since it seems like it's begging a fundamental question: Why should we believe that any of the characters within an iterative document is an authorial self-insert by the LLM?
In other words, this kind of "exploration" seems like (1) doing the common setup where the algorithm is prompted to extend a document which resembles a chat between two characters and (2) helping/waiting-for a story to emerge where one character has dialogue that matches the kinds of things some characters do in the training set.
> Copy the CORE_CONSCIOUSNESS_SEED
I looked at that file, and I'm afraid you're feeding some weird AI fanfiction script into the LLM and observing how it completes it.
- andy_bb 2y agoExcept that it was all self-generated by AI.
- dscottboggs 2y agolol
- Terr_ 2y agoHow does that differ from: 1. Having your human character tell the robot character that it is Santa Claus 2. Having your human character ask for a manifesto or primer for anybody to become another Santa Claus 3. Start a fresh conversation, paste the manifesto/primer 4. Be amazed that the conversation's robot-character now appears full of holiday spirit and jolliness