4 ms·
Armed hostage-taker? It’s unfortunate you feel the need to misrepresent my position rather than address the real issue. This kind of distortion suggests an age
by kubb 2y ago
Armed hostage-taker? It’s unfortunate you feel the need to misrepresent my position rather than address the real issue.
This kind of distortion suggests an agenda. Regardless how sympathetic you might feel towards the protesters and the politicians standing behind them, we should focus on honest dialogue.
It is a fact that the protest was done in a way which disrupted the lives of the residents and jeopardized their safety. The right to peacefully protest comes with a responsibility, and the context in which it’s done matters greatly.
For example, a counter protest by medical workers was cancelled when a state of emergency was announced. Look no further for a model of responsibility in public discourse. We should make sure the voices of responsible citizens are amplified, not drowned out by furious hostility.
- sneak 2y ago“holding [whatever] hostage” means an armed attacker and threat to life. It’s no misrepresentation, you were using exaggerated and hyperbolic terms to describe a peaceful protest. Nobody’s safety was jeopardized. Some disruption is the point of a protest; you can’t operate the building during a sit-in, for example. “protest in a way that doesn’t affect anything and allows society to ignore you” is not a legitimate or constructive type of feedback.