4 ms·
Um... I was on anti Iraq war demos when I was 18, because it was obvious to me Saddam Hussein had no WMDs. And I was _not_ alone in this assumption: "In London
by AkThhhpppt 14y ago
Um... I was on anti Iraq war demos when I was 18, because it was obvious to me Saddam Hussein had no WMDs. And I was _not_ alone in this assumption:
"In London, at least 750,000 people demonstrated in what police called the city's largest demonstration ever."
Source: http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2003/Protest-Iraq-War16feb03.htm http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2003/Protest-Iraq-War16feb03...
- bryanlarsen 14y agoBut I bet that most of those 750,000 believed that Iraq had WMD's of some sort, perhaps very limited in capability. But they also believed that a war was an inappropriate response to the existence of those WMD's.
- AkThhhpppt 14y agoNo, it was more or less assumed to be bollocks. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Blix#Iraq_disarmament_.27crisis.27_.282002-2003.29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Blix#Iraq_disarmament_.27... for an idea of what we were hearing).
- AkThhhpppt 14y ago*Correction: and those who didn't assume it to be bollocks generally had not made up their mind one way or the other, and wanted the weapons inspectors to be given time to find out. When they were given the bum's rush out of Iraq by the Coalition, that persuaded many of the fence-sitters the skeptics were right.