3 ms·
> Shundar (or however that is spelled). You could perhaps google it? And then you would learn that his name is spelled Sundar. Also, “that” is not how one ref
by krisoft 2y ago
> Shundar (or however that is spelled).
You could perhaps google it? And then you would learn that his name is spelled Sundar.
Also, “that” is not how one refers to human beings or their names. But at least we can know how much to trust your opinion. If you got tired postulating about their management but couldn’t be bothered to ever check the name of their CEO.
- cosmotic 2y agoAgreed he could have searched for the spelling, but "that" is probably referring to the word, not the human the word refers to, so "that" seems appropriate here. I would have used "it" ("however it is spelled"). You wouldn't say "however he is spelled". I suppose you could say "however he spells it", but then you're using it to refer to the word in question, putting us back at the start.
- krisoft 2y ago> Agreed he could have searched for the spelling Or just not qualify it. People make typos, nothing wrong with that. But the qualification means they felt they don’t know the spelling but couldn’t be bothered to do the 1 second thing and look it up. It is one of those cases where being confidently wrong is less insulting than being wrong, suspecting that you are wrong but not caring about it. > You wouldn't say "however he is spelled". No. As discussed above I would search for it. But if one has to express this already bad thing one can write “however he spells his name”. I guess the reason i’m sensitive to this is that I’m bored of seeing people performatively mispronounce names. Not saying that is what happened here. In fact it is probably not what happened. Just that it reminded me of that particular kind of uglyness.