IDK if this is a good argument. The amendment process has indeed become impractical in the US, and given that "nature abhors vacuum", a different and easier ro

IDK if this is a good argument. The amendment process has indeed become impractical in the US, and given that "nature abhors vacuum", a different and easier route to bending the constitutional law was found - nominate your people to SCOTUS and let the interpret the Constitution favorably to you. I would argue that this is a very suboptimal solution to the problem.