Agreed. Frontend frameworks often do spend a lot of time thinking about the accessibility concerns associated with client side routing, so it's not absurd to c

Agreed. Frontend frameworks often do spend a lot of time thinking about the accessibility concerns associated with client side routing, so it's not absurd to consider this question in scope for a frontend library that handles DOM updates. See for instance this 2019 study by Gatsby: https://www.gatsbyjs.com/blog/2019-07-11-user-testing-accessible-client-routing/ https://www.gatsbyjs.com/blog/2019-07-11-user-testing-access... Or even the modern Next docs on route announcements: https://nextjs.org/docs/architecture/accessibility#route-announcements https://nextjs.org/docs/architecture/accessibility#route-ann... Some of this will have to be bespoke work done on a per-site basis, but I'm not sure I'm comfortable with the idea of completely punting this responsibility to developers using htmx, even if it does make philosophical sense to say "this is scope creep", because ultimately users with disabilities will end up being the ones whose experience on the web is sacrificed on this altar of ideological purity.