4 ms·
My understanding is that arbitrum has an IP, but this video was not using their IP, that it was a false positive in terms of identifying the IP, in addition to
by TZubiri 2y ago
My understanding is that arbitrum has an IP, but this video was not using their IP, that it was a false positive in terms of identifying the IP, in addition to a false positive of malicious intent.
What you are saying is that these claims never relate to IP and it was only a false positive of malicious intent?
- gruez 2y ago>What you are saying is that these claims never relate to IP and it was only a false positive of malicious intent? I'm not sure how you got that impression. If you read my previous comment it's pretty clear I only objected on the basis they don't have relevant IP, not on the principle of being able to use IP to issue take down scams.