2 ms·
By the way, Scientific Linux isn't perfect when it comes to these delays either. I wanted to make a similar graph plotting SL, but laziness prevailed. (I crawle
by wdaher 14y ago
By the way, Scientific Linux isn't perfect when it comes to these delays either. I wanted to make a similar graph plotting SL, but laziness prevailed. (I crawled the RHEL, CentOS, and OL mailman archives to get the data, but SL uses listserv.)
It's just one data point, but:
Red Hat released RHEL 5.6 on January 13, 2011, but Scientific Linux didn't release SL 5.6 until June 21, 2011
[1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2011-January/msg00000.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2011-January...
[2] http://www.scientificlinux.org/news/sl56 http://www.scientificlinux.org/news/sl56
- rys 14y agoThe SL Wikipedia entry shows you the historical delays: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Linux http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_Linux