3 ms·
> The request seems to have been issued by a company chainpatrol, on behalf of Arbitrum, whose website says they "makes use of advanced LLM scanning" for "Brand
by throwaway290 2y ago
> The request seems to have been issued by a company chainpatrol, on behalf of Arbitrum, whose website says they "makes use of advanced LLM scanning" for "Brand Protection for Leading Web3 Companies"
Tech built on copyright abuse used for copyright trolling? Too early for peak irony of 2025!
- reaperman 2y agoI understand this isn't a DMCA request, so quite a few legal remedies are unavailable for abusing the Youtube reporting system. But it seems like "tortious interference" would still apply here. Is there some reason it wouldn't?
- hnbad 2y agoUsing "LLM scanning" for "Web3" companies sounds like tortious interference already.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- henryfjordan 2y agoTortious Interference might apply, but how much money was actually lost? 2 days of ad revenue on a video from 2017 is not much, certainly not enough to pay the lawyers for a lawsuit.