4 ms·
I'm shocked someone would pay $500 for an erroneously cut $1 bill.
by rufugee 2y ago
I'm shocked someone would pay $500 for an erroneously cut $1 bill.
- bdcravens 2y agoPeople will pay extra for currency that has zero errors, and only an interesting serial number.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- nxobject 2y agoTo wit: the Mint will also sell you in line with Chinese numerology collectible bills with “777”s or “888”s in their SNs with a decorative envelope. Bless the marketing exec who’s finding nontraditional markets for collectible currency.
- thaumasiotes 2y ago> the Mint will also sell you in line with Chinese numerology collectible bills with “777”s or “888”s in their SNs For Chinese numerology, you'd want 666.
- indrora 2y agoSevens are a massive number in Chinese numerology: The 7 parts (yin/yang/metals), the 7 steps, 7 captures, etc. Eights are symbols of prosperity, wealth, generosity, good fortune in business, etc. Six is a kinda useless number for money -- Smoothness and whatnot are less for money and more for one's tongue. You'd name a wine after a six (I've seen "Dice Wine" referring to 6-sided dice) but not look for it in bills
- thaumasiotes 2y agoWell, https://hsbc.banklocationmaps.com/en/chn/shanghai https://hsbc.banklocationmaps.com/en/chn/shanghai only lists one branch at a street address of 666, and that one is really just sharing the address of the commercial center where it's located, but that still seems like enough for this point. 8 is heavily represented. 6 is a runner-up. 7 doesn't appear to be significant in this context. Consider the branch phone numbers: 3888 3888 3888 8468 3888 8900 3888 1200 6279 8582 3888 3111 3888 1318 3888 1188 3888 6455 3888 8618 3888 8688 3888 1218 3888 6388 There is technically one 7 in there, but it seems clear that the bank would have preferred not to have it. Counting only the second halves, 8 is overwhelmingly popular, so is 1 (for reasons I don't know), 6 is only barely ahead of what's typical, but still in third place, and 7 doesn't even exist.
- tmtvl 2y agoFor those who are interested: the Chinese character for 8 is a pair of downward lines, close together at the top, far apart at the bottom. Looks a bit like / \. The idea behind it, as far as I know, is that it represents things growing larger, which is why it is of interest where wealth is concerned.
- thaumasiotes 2y ago> Looks a bit like / \ You can just display the character, 八.
- bufferoverflow 2y agoJust because it's listed at $500, doesn't mean someone will pay that.
- tartoran 2y agoYou underestimate what people pay for. I fall into the same trap though.
- bityard 2y agoThe sold listings for "miscut dollar bill" would beg to differ. I am _always_ and _continually_ surprised at what people will pay for things. Literally _nobody_ scaled back their consumption or purchasing during post-COVID inflation. Home prices are sky-high but it's still a sellers market because buyers are scared that prices will jump again and instead of simply being a difficult purchase, maybe next year it will be an impossible one. Must be easy money being a realtor right now. Every time I have sold something on Craigslist or FB Marketplace in the last few years, I list it 25% higher than what I'd actually pay if I were buying it myself and expect to be negotiated down to something sensible. So far, excluding the low-effort moronic "what's your lowest price" texts, exactly ZERO buyers have tried to negotiate down. I have come to the conclusion that most people simply have no upper limit to what they will pay for something they want. A few will scoff and turn away. Some will complain about it on the Internet, but most will buy it anyway. I don't run a business but if I did, this would be my golden rule of pricing.
- lesuorac 2y agoI think people have an upper limit. Sure, $7 eggs might be below the limit but if you want into a grocery store because you wanted to make french toast and the eggs are $25 are you buying them or just eating something else? I would agree that the upper limit is above what the common price is though. This should really be a good thing because you want people to consume goods; that makes the economy go in a circle. For necessities like food and gas (energy) the government goes out of its way to subsidize them. I just think most people don't feel like putting in the work to figure out what a clearing price for an action would be when selling not-auctioned items. This is where things like RealPage get dangerous because it will find the best price and that best price is not what the median people can afford.
- gosub100 2y agoPeople have such a fascination with anything "rare". It's such a meme on ebay how often the word "RARE" is used.