4 ms·
That’s an easy one to answer. Corporations don’t have police or taxation power and so have more limited impact on your individual freedom. In a “free market”
by liontwist 2y ago
That’s an easy one to answer.
Corporations don’t have police or taxation power and so have more limited impact on your individual freedom.
In a “free market” you can choose what firms you work for and with, except the government.
The government would be more efficient in an autocratic leadership. But government efficiency is not the societies efficiency and well being
- DrScientist 2y ago> In a “free market” you can choose what firms you work for and with, except the government. Eh? Nobody ever leaves one country for another? > The government would be more efficient in an autocratic leadership. But government efficiency is not the societies efficiency and well being I think the free market proponents would say otherwise - one key problem is the myth of perfect information - you are imagining it's possible to concentrate all the required information to make any correct decision into a very small group of people at the top ( and assuming these people are competent and not corrupt). One of the ideas behind why distributed markets work is the information about what is needed is communicated by the mechanisms of the market itself. And to bring it back to the original post - does the CEO have all the information required to direct others to meet the customers need across all areas - or is it better to use the collective intelligence of the entire organisation?