3 ms·
It is against the rules to imply that the person you are responding to hasn’t read the article, but I don’t think it is against the rules to implore the communi
by bee_rider 2y ago
It is against the rules to imply that the person you are responding to hasn’t read the article, but I don’t think it is against the rules to implore the community to read it, generally.
- bee_rider 2y agoAlso just to be more explicit, people can (should) read the article and decide. It is not super long and it is engagingly written. I think the author is kind mythologizing his job… there’s clearly a fraud component to how he got better, and a skill improvement component. It isn’t obvious which contributed more from his telling, and given that his telling is probably inclined to put him in a good light, I lean toward the fraud.