3 ms·
Most of my work is data analysis, and it's the area I find LLMs are most difficult to use, and potentially dangerous! I really worry when I think of how less e
by specproc 2y ago
Most of my work is data analysis, and it's the area I find LLMs are most difficult to use, and potentially dangerous!
I really worry when I think of how less experienced colleagues and Excel power-users might approach a pandas/matplotlib workflow with an LLM.
Very normal example from the other week. I've got a big csv of housing data, poking around I spot a bunch of very weird things in the prices: cheap places where I'd expect high prices, a strange bicameral distribution. I spend a few hours thinking about it before taking it up with the colleague who'd provided the data. There's a bug in the scraper that's messed up a bunch of values!
It'd be super-easy to naively run a simple LLM-driven analysis and miss this sort of thing.
When you're "building things" with AI, feedback is immediate. You press a button, it doesn't work as expected, the charts you can quickly run up don't give the same signals.
- godelski 2y agoI worry about the same thing. Even with traditional tools people mess it up all the time. It's in the same way too, treating your algorithms like black boxes. To really do data analysis you have to understand your data and understand what you're algorithms are doing/what they mean. Too often people just naively plug in numbers and take a result. Unfortunately it's not that easy. I work "AI" just accelerates this problem and brings it to more domains