3 ms·
Very poor. Sloppy. Like ‘hey this tv drama show exists and is my supporting evidence…’ what? The economist, too. Weird. Usually better quality overall. This is
by lynnah 2y ago
Very poor. Sloppy. Like ‘hey this tv drama show exists and is my supporting evidence…’ what?
The economist, too. Weird. Usually better quality overall. This is just weirdly written like a 12 yo that’s been on the facebooks reading anti-boomer propaganda too long.
Also, someone needs to get laid and smoke a joint. I’m
not even joking. Feel bad for the kid. But I don’t see a byline on this, so I’m not sure who.
- robocat 2y ago> But I don’t see a byline on this The Economist doesn't use bylines for their articles: https://medium.economist.com/why-are-the-economists-writers-anonymous-8f573745631d https://medium.economist.com/why-are-the-economists-writers-...