Score is based on the interrogator, a human. If you read a Markov chain bot's text you'd guess it was a bot probably 80-100% of the time. With a real human, you

Score is based on the interrogator, a human. If you read a Markov chain bot's text you'd guess it was a bot probably 80-100% of the time. With a real human, you'd guess it was a bot maybe 0-30% of the time, depending. I'm making up these figures, but the point is lower is better, or "more Human-Like". Test was specified as >50% meaning "accurately determined human vs. bot more than half the time". The site claims LLMs are now guessed correctly less than half, which is how the turing test was defined as per the site. It makes sense, even if you disagree it's significant.