It is a somewhat interesting take. What I am interested in as a person teaching a computing course, what is the best way to force people to understand/interact

It is a somewhat interesting take. What I am interested in as a person teaching a computing course, what is the best way to force people to understand/interact with the code coming from the LLM. I.e. when I give computing problems to students, it is often easy to put the problem in chatgpt and get an answer. In a very significant fraction of cases the code would be somewhat sensible and would pass the tests. In some cases the output would use the wrong approach or would fail the test, but not often enough to completely discourage cheating. In the end this comes down to the question of what skills we want from people writing code with the help of the LLM, and how to test for those skills. (here I'm not talking about professional programmers, but scientists rather)