That's not what they said, and you're being purposely obtuse. They were saying that Llama 3.3, an open model, approaches usefulness, in comparison to o1, a clo

That's not what they said, and you're being purposely obtuse. They were saying that Llama 3.3, an open model, approaches usefulness, in comparison to o1, a closed model, which is already useful to them. As for usefulness in general, it's already here. It's not perfect, it can make mistakes, but saying they're not useful at all - especially for software engineers - is foolish. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42602940 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42602940.