3 ms·
This article is from 2014 and it should be noted as such. Looking at the comments, it's clear people have been misled by the presentation of this article to thi
by trimethylpurine 2y ago
This article is from 2014 and it should be noted as such. Looking at the comments, it's clear people have been misled by the presentation of this article to think this is an emerging technology rather than an old and inappropriate application of one.
For others reading; this is about a small radar technology, having nothing to do with research in the detection of blood glucose whatsoever.
- freedomben 2y ago> This article is from 2014 How do you know? The date on the article says October 29, 2024
- trimethylpurine 2y agoWell, I can agree that now the date on the article is 10/29/2024. When I posted this comment, it was dated 2014. I do see that internet archive has copies of the site that have the 2024 date but not from yesterday. Maybe a dead cmos battery or other time sync error changed the date temporarily yesterday. I don't have any other explanation, but I do respectfully withdraw my former opinion about the article.
- croes 2y agoA simple typo?
- trimethylpurine 2y agoI assumed that web servers handle date variables in this age. But you're absolutely right, we can't assume that.