3 ms·
Clearly you didn’t understand the point at all and didn’t read the rest of the conversation. The matter isn’t about the reason the donation was made, but the ex
by latexr 2y ago
Clearly you didn’t understand the point at all and didn’t read the rest of the conversation. The matter isn’t about the reason the donation was made, but the excuse used to defend it.
- bdangubic 2y agoI for sure understand what you mean but is there any excuse Tim could make that would be “acceptable”? We all know why he made tbe donation and any excuse we know is a lie. perhaps a better lie would have been “better” but nonetheless in the end a lie is a lie
- latexr 2y agoI’m not concerned with Tim Cook’s excuses, I’m referring to excuses other people make to defend the behaviour. As far as I can see Tim Cook didn’t give any reason for the donation, it’s everyone else coming up with something, including the crummy and tired “obligation to shareholders”.