3 ms·
We already have languages for expressing abstractions, they're called programming languages. Working software is always built interactively, with a combination
by Kinrany 2y ago
We already have languages for expressing abstractions, they're called programming languages. Working software is always built interactively, with a combination of top-down and bottom-up reasoning and experimentation. The problem is not in starting with real code, the problem is in being unable to keep editing the draft.
- qup 2y agoNot a problem with the correct tooling.
- Yoric 2y agoI agree. On the other hand, I expect that programming languages will keep evolving, and the next generation or so might be designed with LLMs in mind. For instance, there's a conversation in the Rust's lang forum on how to best extract API documentation for processing by an LLM. Will this help? No idea. But it's an interesting experiment nevertheless.