3 ms·
What I miss in the paper is any accuracy figure for glucose sensing. If this is an alternative to needles, how would the measurements compare? That is the first
by exceptione 2y ago
What I miss in the paper is any accuracy figure for glucose sensing. If this is an alternative to needles, how would the measurements compare? That is the first question one should ask.
I fear we can assume that, although the approach might be novel, it can't replace needles for accurate measurement. But maybe I am overlooking the performance comparison.
- DavideNL 2y agoYea, it might perhaps be described more detailed in the mentioned paper (i haven't checked it yet.): https://www.nature.com/articles/s44172-024-00194-4 https://www.nature.com/articles/s44172-024-00194-4 EDIT: No, i don't think it's mentioned...
- bobmcnamara 2y agoThey claim 90-some percent
- croes 2y agoSeems like it's nowhere near usable for glucose sensing https://chaos.social/@jaseg/113777015012964743 https://chaos.social/@jaseg/113777015012964743