3 ms·
Girard is one of the top logicians of his time. He can write standard mathematical prose when he wants to. In turn, when he chooses to use the continental philo
by saithound 2y ago
Girard is one of the top logicians of his time. He can write standard mathematical prose when he wants to. In turn, when he chooses to use the continental philosophy style, it's a deliberate choice: people who can't read it are not in the target audience anyway.
Somebody who worked through the two volumes of "Proof Theory and Logical Complexity", and worked through the later chapters of "The Blind Spot" will already be used to the style, so won't find it an obstacle when reading the Transcendental Syntax papers. And those who didn't read these works? Well, they don't know the prerequisites anyway (the author assumes), so making the style more palatable to them is not a priority.
The aforementioned works are better starting points: they cover classical proof theory, so there are many other textbooks that can be consulted while the reader develops familiarity with Girard's style. And one needs to know the material to understand Transcendental Syntax anyway.
- Tainnor 2y agoYeah, after doing some research I realised that he isn't some crank and actually has done a lot of relevant work in logic. I still don't think that justifies writing in a deliberately obtuse style, but I guess he can do whatever he wants.
- Nevermark 2y agoAgreed! I would think the target audience might include people who would like to be in the target audience. It always bothers me when that is apparently not the case.