4 ms·

I see you've repeated this in a few comments. Do you have a link? By the way, I'm not disagreeing. I'm Australian and curious about the US situation. My unders

I see you've repeated this in a few comments. Do you have a link? By the way, I'm not disagreeing. I'm Australian and curious about the US situation. My understanding was that whilst you can't assign copyright — insofar as you ought to always be able refer to yourself as the original author — you can provide an irrevocable license giving someone else the rights to reproduce, license and sublicense as they see fit.

KPGv2 2y ago
The person you're responding to is wrong. CLAs are not transfers of copyright ownership or code ownership. They're only licenses (that's the "L" in "CLA") that grant the recipient a set of rights for how they are allowed to use your code that you retain ownership over.