4 ms·

Right, that's why I pointed it out. There isn't any evidence this is something people even want to happen, let alone that it will.

fidotron 2y ago
No, it is you that doesn’t want it to happen and so are having a strangely extreme reaction to a simple observation. Apparently you are not alone in that.
- CyberDildonics 2y ago
  It isn't a "strangely extreme reaction" to say that something that hasn't happened hasn't happened.
  - fidotron 2y ago
    Assuming English is not your first language your reaction is extreme for two reasons: firstly I was clearly referring to the future, and secondly it is happening anyway. Sadly for you AI griefer bots are a thing, so that side of your reason to exist is also under threat, but you can deny the existence of those too if it will make you feel better.
    - CyberDildonics 2y ago
      I was clearly referring to the future You said "It's occurring" which is the present. Sadly for you AI griefer bots are a thing, so that side of your reason to exist is also under threat, but you can deny the existence of those too if it will make you feel better. What is this supposed to mean? You think pointing out that was you said is happening right now isn't actually happening is 'griefing' you? You aren't being persecuted by someone replying to you. You can always avoid saying things that aren't true or give evidence that they are. If you show me some sort of realtime hallucination that takes rough renders and outputs temporally coherent images in 16ms or less I'll say that you are right that this is happening.
      - fidotron 2y ago
        > You said "It's occurring" which is the present. Hallucination.
        CyberDildonics 2y ago
        You said "It's kind of ridiculous that this occurs". This is the present tense. I don't think you're hallucinating though, I think you just got mixed up with thinking a wild extrapolation was automatically coming true right now.
        fidotron 2y ago
        > You said "It's kind of ridiculous that this occurs". This is the present tense. LOL! Convincing griefing requires a slightly larger context window!
        CyberDildonics 2y ago
        This seems like you're trying to distract from backing up what you said with evidence. I think if you had some evidence you would have linked it already.
        fidotron 2y ago
        Ha! No troll ever resorted to asking for citations. The question is what for? The original claims: > The future of 3D graphics is going to be feeding generative NNs with very simple template scenes, and using the NN to apply almost all the lighting and styling. > It's kind of ridiculous that this occurs just as the dream of raytracing hardware approaches viability. Or what you extrapolated that to in your imagination: > If you show me some sort of realtime hallucination that takes rough renders and outputs temporally coherent images in 16ms or less I'll say that you are right that this is happening. These are not the same. If you think so you have serious comprehension problems. You're a simple troll arguing against things you've imagined. Get back under your bridge.

fidotron 2y ago

No, it is you that doesn’t want it to happen and so are having a strangely extreme reaction to a simple observation. Apparently you are not alone in that.

CyberDildonics 2y ago
It isn't a "strangely extreme reaction" to say that something that hasn't happened hasn't happened.
- fidotron 2y ago
  Assuming English is not your first language your reaction is extreme for two reasons: firstly I was clearly referring to the future, and secondly it is happening anyway. Sadly for you AI griefer bots are a thing, so that side of your reason to exist is also under threat, but you can deny the existence of those too if it will make you feel better.
  - CyberDildonics 2y ago
    I was clearly referring to the future You said "It's occurring" which is the present. Sadly for you AI griefer bots are a thing, so that side of your reason to exist is also under threat, but you can deny the existence of those too if it will make you feel better. What is this supposed to mean? You think pointing out that was you said is happening right now isn't actually happening is 'griefing' you? You aren't being persecuted by someone replying to you. You can always avoid saying things that aren't true or give evidence that they are. If you show me some sort of realtime hallucination that takes rough renders and outputs temporally coherent images in 16ms or less I'll say that you are right that this is happening.
    - fidotron 2y ago
      > You said "It's occurring" which is the present. Hallucination.
      - CyberDildonics 2y ago
        You said "It's kind of ridiculous that this occurs". This is the present tense. I don't think you're hallucinating though, I think you just got mixed up with thinking a wild extrapolation was automatically coming true right now.
        fidotron 2y ago
        > You said "It's kind of ridiculous that this occurs". This is the present tense. LOL! Convincing griefing requires a slightly larger context window!
        CyberDildonics 2y ago
        This seems like you're trying to distract from backing up what you said with evidence. I think if you had some evidence you would have linked it already.
        fidotron 2y ago
        Ha! No troll ever resorted to asking for citations. The question is what for? The original claims: > The future of 3D graphics is going to be feeding generative NNs with very simple template scenes, and using the NN to apply almost all the lighting and styling. > It's kind of ridiculous that this occurs just as the dream of raytracing hardware approaches viability. Or what you extrapolated that to in your imagination: > If you show me some sort of realtime hallucination that takes rough renders and outputs temporally coherent images in 16ms or less I'll say that you are right that this is happening. These are not the same. If you think so you have serious comprehension problems. You're a simple troll arguing against things you've imagined. Get back under your bridge.