I don’t think this is a different angle at all. > the people can always amend the Constitution My point is that the people cannot do that. Yes, the technical

I don’t think this is a different angle at all. > the people can always amend the Constitution My point is that the people cannot do that. Yes, the technical ability exists, but the chances of getting anything passed is very low. So we exist in a limbo where everything gets decided by the courts.