3 ms·
> Flash has big disk energy, but is fast enough that copying it to RAM one word at a time like disk will probably bottleneck your performance by an order of mag
by mrkeen 2y ago
> Flash has big disk energy, but is fast enough that copying it to RAM one word at a time like disk will probably bottleneck your performance by an order of magnitude.
Much more of a slowdown than that. Mmap a big file on an SSD, access its bytes randomly, and you can get your 500MB/s read speed down to kilobytes/s.
> We need interfaces designed for zero-copy access to bulk persistent data.
This is in tension with caching. For it to work, you'd need to get system builders to stop bundling smaller&faster storage with their slower&larger storage.
- kragen 2y agoI think that you have read me to be saying the opposite of what I meant in both of these cases. Possibly https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42595851 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42595851 will clarify.