2 ms·
I said it's "a matter of fact that was clearly visible for years" which is the opposite of claiming to have special knowledge, so why the straw man? No special
by mike_hearn 2y ago
I said it's "a matter of fact that was clearly visible for years" which is the opposite of claiming to have special knowledge, so why the straw man? No special knowledge is needed to know that this claim is objectively true, you can just watch videos of him and see it for yourself. Why are you expecting me to cite evidence for something so widely accepted his own party didn't let him run for President again? If you really cannot see what everyone else can see - even his own party - then I'm not going to spend time on trying to convince you.
As for seeing stuff in Fox News, I don't think that particular organization is what the people who started this thread were thinking of.
- mmooss 2y agoFox and the NY Times are both journalism. If you aren't talking about that, then it's just more evidence that it is just the angry mob of the right trying to force others to comply.