2 ms·
"Wouldn’t be surprised if the non-endorsal was a quid-pro-quo with Trump in exchange for Trump not axing or messing with Bezos’ many govt contracts." You descr
by Paradigma11 2y ago
"Wouldn’t be surprised if the non-endorsal was a quid-pro-quo with Trump in exchange for Trump not axing or messing with Bezos’ many govt contracts."
You describe highly tyrannical and corrupt behavior and say the previous Trump coverage was absurd and unfair...
- burner999888 2y agoThat was actually just a verbal agreement between two private citizens at that point. Yet you likely ignore the weaponization of the justice system to take-down/bankrupt political opponents and use govt contracts to essentially bypass 1st amendment rights and use that to try to sway an election. That’s borderline treason in America and hopefully people will go down for that soon. Theres a reason Trump won the POPULAR VOTE and ALL swing states. The educated left is still in SEVERE denial and are actively ignoring facts. Cognitive dissonance 101.
- Paradigma11 2y agoSure, then blackmail is also just a verbal agreement between two private citizens. But on another note, Trump is still fantasizing that he won 2020. So my question is, what would have been the recourse if Pence went along with the fake elector scheme. How would Trump have been removed from office?