3 ms·
"I only robbed your house because you threatened to join the neighborhood watch!" isn't the incisive argument you may have meant to advance.
by CamperBob2 2y ago
"I only robbed your house because you threatened to join the neighborhood watch!" isn't the incisive argument you may have meant to advance.
- ANewFormation 2y agoThese sort of black and white, good and evil, analogs don't make any sense as NATO is, in large part, a proxy for the US. And we've overthrown, invaded, and destroyed more countries than literally anybody. Multiple of those invasions were also based on fabricated evidence/lies. And when international law, such as the UN, gets in the way - we simply ignore it. These are not the behaviours of a 'neighbourhood watch.'
- discreteevent 2y ago> These sort of black and white, good and evil, analogs don't make any sense. Not black and white but worse and better. And Russia is so much worse (Its main offerings seem to be destruction and thievery) that nearly all of its neighbours tried to join NATO.
- invalidOrTaken 2y agoI don't think this is an apt analogy. It would be more like "I only robbed your house b/c you threatened to join the neighborhood watch, after twenty years of explicit promises by the neighborhood watch that you wouldn't." And the "neighborhood watch" vs "crime" thing is stacking the deck a bit---in modern society we have a professionalized police force and a norm against vigilante first-strike violence, but sovereign countries can by definition go to war. This doesn't even mean I "want Russia to win" or whatever, but I definitely would like NATO to put on its adult pants.
- CamperBob2 2y agoafter twenty years of explicit promises by the neighborhood watch that you wouldn't You've been lied to. Instead of propagating the lie, please consider informing yourself. Begin by understanding the fact that any such promises were made to a state that no longer exists by people who were unauthorized to make them. Moving on, consider that nobody spends billions of dollars or Euros preparing to defend themselves against countries who are not a genuine threat to peace and stability, particularly those whose leaders have stated their revanchist goals publicly and unequivocally. Then, go back to the people who lied to you, ask them why they did so, and ask them not to do it again. Chances are, someone lied to them, too.