5 ms·
What is your purpose of publishing where having the content used to train AI is a problem? Are you trying to gatekeep information that's not even protected by c
by foxglacier 2y ago
What is your purpose of publishing where having the content used to train AI is a problem? Are you trying to gatekeep information that's not even protected by copyright anyway? Are you worried your potential audience will get the same thing (including your personal creativity) from AI that just copied your work so they don't recognize your name and develop some brand awareness? Or do you just not like AI and don't want to help it? Maybe you could build your own paywall or other technical access restriction instead of making it freely available? Even just a captcha should block AI training scrapers, shouldn't it?
- asdff 2y agoNo attribution with ai
- foxglacier 2y agoBut also no direct copying, typically. Would OP really be happy with an AI that reliably rewords everything so that attribution is not required but still reproduces the information?
- rchaud 2y agoHuman educational systems penalize you for not citing sources (i.e. not showing your work, not crediting referenced works). Why should an AI system be exempt?
- foxglacier 2y agoBecause it's not a student at school, obviously. You didn't cite the source for the claim you just made there and you didn't need to.