3 ms·
Even if no attribution etc is your personal policy that’s not everyone else’s. That's up to the courts. As usual, we will all lose if the copyright maximalist
by CamperBob2 2y ago
Even if no attribution etc is your personal policy that’s not everyone else’s.
That's up to the courts. As usual, we will all lose if the copyright maximalists win.
- liontwist 2y agoLast I checked creators of a work held copyright for it and that hasn’t changed. So no, this is not a new legal question
- CamperBob2 2y agoThat's not how copyright law works. That's not how anything works.
- liontwist 2y agoOk. Thanks for your contribution to the discussion.
- tonyedgecombe 2y agoTo me it looks like individual creators are the ones most likely to lose. I was watching an interview with John Warnock (one of the founders of Adobe) and he was proud of the fact that the US went from having 25,000 graphic designers to 2,500,000 largely thanks to software his company created. I do wonder if we are on the verge of reversing that shift.
- CamperBob2 2y agoThe question you should be asking is if we need 2,500,000 graphic designers. Humans have a higher purpose than doing a robot's job.
- tonyedgecombe 2y agoHumans have a higher purpose than doing whatever job robots can't.
- CamperBob2 2y agoWhatever that purpose is, you're not going to achieve it while doing a job that robots can.
- tonyedgecombe 2y agoWhich is the point I was making in the first place.