It’s fine if you don’t want features in your terminal, but telling people who do like having software that has features not to use an alternative just because “

It’s fine if you don’t want features in your terminal, but telling people who do like having software that has features not to use an alternative just because “more features equals complexity equals security risk” in the way you’re doing it is pretty condescending. Let’s not forget that basically every graphical IDE on the planet has an integrated terminal emulator, and for good reason I’d have a smaller attack surface if I turned my computer off and did all my work for my employer with pen and paper. I’d have a smaller attack surface if I didn’t buy a Mac at all and only used a security-hardened distro. And here you are acting like Apple is God’s gift to stability and security when every single fall season Apple’s major dot zero version updates ship with visible bugs all over the place. And to nitpick you, the assumption that more than one person is actively working on the default macOS terminal is laughable. I doubt it even has a full time employee dedicating 100% of their time to it. The yearly release notes look like less than one person’s annual output of work. I remember that thread on here where the person who worked on Rosetta 2 said it was a solo project for years until closer to release when the team expanded to around 10.