3 ms·
Indeed. This situation reminds me of when SMS was new, where you had to pay 25¢ to send a text, and the recipient had to pay 25¢ to receive the text. The ISPs w
by do_not_redeem 2y ago
Indeed. This situation reminds me of when SMS was new, where you had to pay 25¢ to send a text, and the recipient had to pay 25¢ to receive the text. The ISPs want to double dip, get paid twice for the same data like cell phone companies were doing in the 90s.
- _blk 2y agoNot necessarily since you pay for wireless connectivity. RX/TX doesn't matter. Recipient could be on a different network too. You want a text, you cover the costs. Banks still charge me on both ends for int'l wires. Now I personally agree with you and not with the reasoning I presented above but it's still an argument.